At a time when public discourse is saturated with calls for economic sovereignty and a break from external dependencies, the announcement of a €3 million Italian grant to ‘boost the tomato sector’ rings as an admission of weakness, if not a glaring contradiction. For a state that champions self-reliance and autarky, reaching out for help with such basic horticulture raises a fundamental question: can one truly claim sovereignty when dependent on Europe to grow one’s own tomatoes?

Self-sufficiency cannot be funded from outside

True sovereignty is not bought with subsidies or foreign loans, even if they are labelled ‘development cooperation’. If a country chooses the path of autonomy, it must bear its mechanisms: mobilise national savings, reorient its own budgets, and trust its local genius.

The tomato is neither a cutting-edge microprocessor nor space technology requiring complex Western know-how transfer. It is a crop mastered for generations by local farmers. Injecting millions of euros from Rome to set up small-scale irrigation or processing units demonstrates a chronic inability to structure our own economy through our own means. This perpetuates the aid cycle, dressed in new managerial jargon.

Food and security planning: the great void

Beyond the ideological inconsistency, this project highlights a far more serious problem: the complete lack of seriousness in strategic planning, both in food and security terms.

How can one conceive a viable agricultural development plan over three years in structurally unstable areas without strict coordination with territorial security? Developing production basins without first guaranteeing the safe free movement of goods and people amounts to amateurism. Small-scale irrigation infrastructure, however costly, will be useless if farmers cannot access their fields or if harvests are abandoned due to security threats.

Moreover, the absence of planning is evident in the value chain management:

• The diagnosis is known: the country produces in bulk from January to June, then loses everything due to lack of storage, while importing tomato paste for the rest of the year.
• The response is short-termist: instead of building a genuine national agro-industry financed by local capital or endogenous public-private partnerships, reliance is placed on external funds to ‘patch the gaps’.

For a genuine break

If the chosen sovereignist path is serious, it requires a radical break from these practices. Reviving the tomato sector or any other strategic sector requires rigorous planning that links land security, patriotic financing, and protection of the domestic market against massive imports.

Continuing to celebrate €3 million envelopes from Europe keeps the country in a facade of sovereignty, where rhetoric is self-sufficient but plates remain at the mercy of Western capitals. It is time to move from posture to genuine planning.

By Boureima Amadou — Reporter